Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Emmanuel Wallerstein:
Why do workers vote for rightwing (even far rightwing) parties? Why do those whose standard of living has been declining or who live in rural areas with weak infrastructure support a man and a program based on decreased taxes for the wealthy and reduced safety nets for themselves? If one reads the statements they make on the internet or in answers to queries from news reporters, the answer seems clear if complex.
They know they have been doing badly in terms of income and benefits in the regimes led by more traditionally Establishment presidents over the previous twenty years.
They assert that they see no reason to presume that continuing the previous policies will improve their situation.
They think it is not unreasonable to assume that they might do better with a candidate who promises to govern in a completely different fashion. Is this so implausible?
They believe that the slightly redistributive promises of the previous regimes have not helped them. When they hear these same regimes boast of (and vastly overstate) the social progress they have made in aiding “minorities” to be better integrated into governmental programs or social rights, it is easy to understand they associate redistribution and minorities, and therefore conclude that others are advancing at their expense.
Understanding the motives of others does not mean legitimating their motives or even negotiating with them. It means we should pursue social transformation realistically without blaming others for not supporting us by arguing that they are making errors of judgment.
Response
When Hillary Clinton used the term “deplorables,” I flinched. Now, with hindsight, I recognize how condescending and judgmental was and is the term. As I join Mr. Wallerstein in attempting to understand the consciousness of Trump supporters, I am newly sensitized to terms that derogate, debase, devalue and dishonor those whose moment in national history and, in fact, in international geo-politics is different from mine.
How to apply the same consideration to Mr. Trump remains, for me, inconceivable. This is not an issue of party politics and not an issue of opposition to a particular proposal he brings to the presidency, but rather a personal angst about the human being that he is. Am I merely camouflaging the term deplorable?